[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181031211935.p2pxr7fh26m5dc7v@smtp.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:19:35 -0300
From: Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] drm: Rename crtc_idr as object_idr to
KMS cleanups
On 10/31, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura wrote:
>
> > Rename 'drm_mode_config.crtc_idr' as 'drm_mode_config.object_idr',
> > as proposed in the task description in TODO list for KMS cleanups.
>
> Is object_idr a field that already exists? If so, "Rename" is not the
> best choice of words. It should be something like "use the object_idr
> field instead of the crtc_idr field" and then explain why. "task
> description in TODO list for KMS cleanups" isn't very helpful to
> understand why the change should be made.
>
> julia
Hi Julia,
Thank you for your review!
This patch is to solve this TODO task:
drm_mode_config.crtc_idr is misnamed, since it contains all KMS object.
Should be renamed to drm_mode_config.object_idr.
Do you think I need to use this description in my commit message?
Best,
Shayenne
Powered by blists - more mailing lists