linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] base/drivers/arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181031042737.ncpzf7unws4cjdis@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 09:57:37 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] base/drivers/arch_topology: Remove useless check

On 30-10-18, 14:35, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I'm wondering if having a statically per_cpu variable, even if it is not
> free at the end, isn't worth regarding the twisted code we end up with
> an allocation.

Maybe yeah.

-- 
viresh