[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3iO9ehQbZm_haTV0IuZ0qhsVHR0QLUbTgRJT8ZenGuRsnz2_uBvO93f0bHVYnsApibUT16JsJ0dgphLhUBd-u0t-lDBNsbvvlKWTgq8XOlw=@protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 06:55:54 +0000
From: Mogens Jensen <mogens-jensen@...tonmail.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Dean Wallace <duffydack73@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...lessm.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression found (Stop-marking-clocks-as-CLK_IS_CRITICAL)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 9:29 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31-10-18 07:02, Mogens Jensen wrote:
>
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:10 PM, Hans de Goede hdegoede@...hat.com wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > On 30-10-18 19:56, Mogens Jensen wrote:
> > >
> > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:04 PM, Hans de Goede hdegoede@...hat.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > On 30-10-18 16:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > On 30-10-18 16:04, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In addition I am not aware of any baytrail device using plt_clk_0, so moving a common machine driver such a cht_bsw_max98090_ti to use plt_clk0 only would break other devices (e.g. Rambi/Orco). Asking for both clocks to be on might work though,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, so we need to have a DMI based quirk for the Swanky and maybe also
> > > > > > the clapper to use plt_clk_0 there. Asking for 2 clks if we only need
> > > > > > one does not seem like a good plan.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dean, Mogens,
> > > > > To write a proper patch for this I'm going to need DMI strings
> > > > > from your devices.
> > > > > Can you please run (as normal user):
> > > > > grep . /sys/class/dmi/id/* 2> /dev/null
> > > > > And reply with the output of this command?
> > > > > I have attached the output from a coreboot seabios based clapper.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > > Should I still test 0001-ASoC-intel-cht_bsw_max98090_ti-Use-pmc_plt_clk_0-ins.patch with SND_SOC_INTEL_CHT_BSW_MAX98090_TI_MACH and asoundrc from Dean? There seems to have been some development in the case since that request was made.
> > >
> > > Yes please test that, I expect that to also fix things for the
> > > Clapper, but I need to have that confirmed before submitting a
> > > patch upstream adding a quirk for the Clapper to use pmc_plt_clk_0
> > > instead of pmc_plt_clk_3.
> > > Regards,
> > > Hans
> >
> > Unfortunately I only have access to longterm kernel 4.14 for building/running on this system, and 0001-ASoC-intel-cht_bsw_max98090_ti-Use-pmc_plt_clk_0-ins.patch does not patch against 4.14.78. Can a test patch for 4.14 be created?
>
> Can you run (as root):
>
> for i in /sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_?; do echo -n "$i: "; cat $i/clk_flags; echo; done
>
> When running a kernel with working audio?
>
> Then I can confirm that the Clapper is also using pmc_plt_clk_0, so that I can
> fix this for the clapper for 4.18+
>
> I've just checked the 4.14 sources and in 4.14 the SND_SOC_INTEL_CHT_BSW_MAX98090_TI_MACH
> driver does not support mclk control yet, so for the 4.14 kernel the only way to
> fix this is to revert the 648e921888ad ("clk: x86: Stop marking clocks as CLK_IS_CRITICAL")
> commit.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
Here is the output from the Clapper with 4.14.78 and working sound:
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_0: 0x00000800
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_1: 0x00000000
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_2: 0x00000000
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_3: 0x00000000
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_4: 0x00000000
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/pmc_plt_clk_5: 0x00000000
Will 648e921888ad ("clk: x86: Stop marking clocks as CLK_IS_CRITICAL") be reverted upstream for 4.14?
Dean, Thank you, but I will see if I can change the build system to accept a newer kernel, if I get some time later today.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists