[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZCv9z=uALo-PShS-RegNt2cOwOHWE=6vsRVgPm9oOQ_Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:43:01 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, zhaoyifan <zhao_steven@....net>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] arm64: allwinner: h6: Add common orangepi nodes into dtsi
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:37 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > Orangepi H6 boards, One Plus and Lite2 shares common
> > nodes like axp805, uart, mmc0 etc and the common differences
> > between them is Ethernet is available in One Plus where
> > as Wifi, USB3, CSI port is available in Lite2.
>
> You can claim this for pretty much all Allwinner boards, because they mostly
> derive from the reference designs Allwinner's design houses put out. Yet we
> don't do this for all of them. We do this for boards that are clearly derived
> or extended from one another. One example would be the Orange Pi PC and PC Plus.
>
> Do you have any evidence to suggest so? This is not about common device nodes,
> but a common hardware design.
I got this information from hardware schematics and from Steven (added
in to list), he too claimed the same.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists