linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: Use define directive for PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0af2686f-3d9a-3ca6-e5c2-2955ffbd8bd5@mentor.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:52:14 +0200
From:   Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: Use define directive for
 PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT

Hi Nathan,

thank you for your patch.

On 11/01/2018 02:52 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Clang warns when one enumerated type is implicitly converted to another:
> 
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c:643:29: warning: implicit conversion
> from enumeration type 'enum lpc18xx_pin_config_param' to different
> enumeration type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wenum-conversion]
>         {"nxp,gpio-pin-interrupt", PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT, 0},
>         ~                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c:648:12: warning: implicit conversion
> from enumeration type 'enum lpc18xx_pin_config_param' to different
> enumeration type 'enum pin_config_param' [-Wenum-conversion]
>         PCONFDUMP(PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT, "gpio pin int", NULL, true),
>         ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h:163:11: note: expanded from
> macro 'PCONFDUMP'
>         .param = a, .display = b, .format = c, .has_arg = d     \
>                  ^
> 2 warnings generated.
> 
> It is expected that pinctrl drivers can extend pin_config_param because
> of the gap between PIN_CONFIG_END and PIN_CONFIG_MAX so this conversion
> isn't an issue. Most drivers that take advantage of this define the
> PIN_CONFIG variables as constants, rather than enumerated values. Do the
> same thing here so that Clang no longer warns.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/140
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> index a14bc5e5fc24..4bee606088e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> @@ -631,13 +631,10 @@ static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc lpc18xx_pins[] = {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> - * enum lpc18xx_pin_config_param - possible pin configuration parameters
>   * @PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT: route gpio to the gpio pin interrupt
>   * 	controller.
>   */
> -enum lpc18xx_pin_config_param {
> -	PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT = PIN_CONFIG_END + 1,
> -};
> +#define PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT		(PIN_CONFIG_END + 1)
>  
>  static const struct pinconf_generic_params lpc18xx_params[] = {
>  	{"nxp,gpio-pin-interrupt", PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT, 0},
> 

The change, if it is applied, starts to produce a W=1 warning:

	drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c:634: warning: Cannot understand  * @PIN_CONFIG_GPIO_PIN_INT: route gpio to the gpio pin interrupt on line 634 - I thought it was a doc line

Could you please take a look how to satisfy process_name() check from scripts/kernel-doc?

My proposals are:
1) change the first line of the comment block from '/**' to '/*',
2) remove '@' prefix symbol and place pinconf description on one line.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir