[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181101095002.GA118944@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:50:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
dwmw@...zon.co.uk, bp@...e.de, srinivas.eeda@...cle.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] retpolines: Only enable retpoline support when
compiler support it
* Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com> wrote:
> Since retpoline capable compilers are widely available, make
> CONFIG_RETPOLINE hard depend on it.
>
> The check of RETPOLINE is changed to CONFIG_RETPOLINE.
>
> This change is based on suggestion in https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/18/1016
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Please turn such 'based on suggestions' into proper tags as well, i.e.
something like:
Suggested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
> config RETPOLINE
> bool "Avoid speculative indirect branches in kernel"
> + depends on $(cc-option,-mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register) || \
> + $(cc-option,-mretpoline-external-thunk)
At least a comment should be added that this is the retpoline feature
check for GCC and Clang.
Also, whitespace damage plus the two options should align vertically.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists