[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181101191347.74eadff4a5d1fab2d79d7efe@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 19:13:47 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kretprobe: produce sane stack traces
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 00:39:12 +1100
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com> wrote:
> On 2018-10-31, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > > Anyway, until that merge happens, this patch looks good to avoid
> > > this issue for generic solution (e.g. for the arch which doesn't
> > > supports retstack).
> >
> > I think its time to come up with an algorithm that makes function graph
> > work with multiple users, and have kretprobes be able to hook into it
> > just like kprobes hooks into function tracer.
> >
> > I have some ideas on how to get this done, and will try to have an RFC
> > patch set ready by plumbers.
>
> Should I continue working on this patchset?
Yes, until we finally introduce Steven's algorithm on all arch (yeah, we still
have some archs which don't support graph-tracer but supports kprobes),
I think your patch is the best fix for this issue.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists