[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181101112411.4itilpv7mruybiat@yubo-2>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 07:24:12 -0400
From: YU Bo <tsu.yubo@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kobject: fix warnings use pr_* to replace printk
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:48:15AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 09:41 -0400, YU Bo wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:01:50AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 08:01 -0400, Bo YU wrote:
>> > > Fix warning from checkpatch.pl use pr_* to replace printk
>> >
>> > If you look at msg, it can be unterminated with newline.
>> >
>> > > diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
>> > []
>> > > @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int kobject_synth_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, const char *buf, size_t count)
>> > > out:
>> > > if (r) {
>> > > devpath = kobject_get_path(kobj, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > > - printk(KERN_WARNING "synth uevent: %s: %s",
>> > > + pr_warn("synth uevent: %s: %s",
>> > > devpath ?: "unknown device",
>> > > msg ?: "failed to send uevent");
>> > > kfree(devpath);
>> >
>> > Perhaps this block should be:
>> >
>> > diff --git a/lib/kobject_uevent.c b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
>> > index 63d0816ab23b..0ba1197f366e 100644
>> > --- a/lib/kobject_uevent.c
>> > +++ b/lib/kobject_uevent.c
>> > @@ -195,12 +195,12 @@ int kobject_synth_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, const char *buf, size_t count)
>> > enum kobject_action action;
>> > const char *action_args;
>> > struct kobj_uevent_env *env;
>> > - const char *msg = NULL, *devpath;
>> > + const char *msg = NULL;
>> > int r;
>> >
>> > r = kobject_action_type(buf, count, &action, &action_args);
>> > if (r) {
>> > - msg = "unknown uevent action string\n";
>> > + msg = "unknown uevent action string";
>> > goto out;
>> > }
>> >
>> > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ int kobject_synth_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, const char *buf, size_t count)
>> > r = kobject_action_args(action_args,
>> > count - (action_args - buf), &env);
>> > if (r == -EINVAL) {
>> > - msg = "incorrect uevent action arguments\n";
>> > + msg = "incorrect uevent action arguments";
>> > goto out;
>> > }
>> >
>> > @@ -223,10 +223,11 @@ int kobject_synth_uevent(struct kobject *kobj, const char *buf, size_t count)
>> > kfree(env);
>> > out:
>> > if (r) {
>> > - devpath = kobject_get_path(kobj, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > - printk(KERN_WARNING "synth uevent: %s: %s",
>> > - devpath ?: "unknown device",
>> > - msg ?: "failed to send uevent");
>> > + char *devpath devpath = kobject_get_path(kobj, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > +
>> > + pr_warn("synth uevent: %s: %s\n",
>> > + devpath ?: "unknown device",
>> > + msg ?: "failed to send uevent");
>> > kfree(devpath);
>> > }
>> > return r;
>> Sorry, but i have two stupid questions to annoy you:
>> Q1: If i agree with your patch, here should i to do? Acked-by tag or others or nothing to do?
>
>Send V2 with content and explanation of what
>it does and why.
>
>> Q2: In fact, i do not know how to test the patch. Only to cat /sys/bus/pci/* or something?
>
>That wouldn't work as these go to dmesg only on
>certain conditions.
>
>It's a trivial patch, obviously correct.
Thank you, joe, i will do.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists