[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181101092244.2ad82f18@vmware.local.home>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 09:22:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kretprobe: produce sane stack traces
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 21:49:48 +1100
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com> wrote:
> > > Should I continue working on this patchset?
> >
> > Yes, until we finally introduce Steven's algorithm on all arch (yeah, we still
> > have some archs which don't support graph-tracer but supports kprobes),
> > I think your patch is the best fix for this issue.
Agreed.
>
> Thanks, I just sent a v3.
Thanks. Hopefully I can take a look at it today or tomorrow. I'm still
trying to get home (sitting at yet another airport as I write this).
>
> Though, even with Steven's hooking of kprobes I think you'd still need
> to stash away the stack trace somewhere (or am I misunderstanding the
> proposal?).
I'll start working on it and then we can see what is needed when there
is actual code. I need to probably change the func graph generic
interface which will require changes in all the archs that support
function graph tracer.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists