linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Re-initialize DLL if MCLK is gated dynamically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:33:21 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To:     vbadigan@...eaurora.org
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, riteshh@...eaurora.org,
        stummala@...eaurora.org, sayalil@...eaurora.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Re-initialize DLL if MCLK is gated dynamically

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:08 AM Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
<vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>  static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_v5_var = {
>         .mci_removed = true,
> +       .restore_dll_config = false,
> +       .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
> +       .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdm845_sdhci_var = {
> +       .mci_removed = true,
> +       .restore_dll_config = true,
>         .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
>         .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
>  };

One last thing: are there actually any "v5" controllers that _don't_
require restoring the DLL?  Since "sdm845" is currently the only v5
controller maybe just set "restore_dll_config = true" for all v5
controllers and when there's a new v5 controller that doesn't need it
then match off the SoC-specific compatible string.  As per my review
of the bindings patch IMO you should include both the "v5" and the
SoC-specific string for SDM845 (and all future SoCs) so you could make
the generic v5 case do this...

-Doug