[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg+=W1HN4CCp-_awNs9+WGSt3iDq_dWBhyYGu=iF_aHTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:07:17 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, swhiteho@...hat.com,
john.johansen@...onical.com, alan.christopher.jenkins@...il.com,
ebiederm@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] mount API series
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:05 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Do you mind if we end up with work.mount rebased?
> The usual objections re testing in -next do not apply in this case,
> AFAICS...
I was assuming that the work.mount branch would be entirely re-done, yes.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists