[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154111534593.88331.1129843003477644482@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:35:45 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>,
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Implement devm_of_clk_add_provider
Quoting Ricardo Ribalda Delgado (2018-11-01 07:40:39)
> All Tull reported that there might be a great ammount of drivers with
> imbalance on clk_add_provider. This is an issue for Device tree overlays
> (and also a bug) https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/1103
>
> This patchset implement a devm_ function of of_clk_add_provider, and
> fixes 3 drivers.
>
> Drivers like clk-gpio will be easily fixed with coccinelle if this set
> is accepted. (I volunteer, I want to learn how to use it, just seen the
> great presentations from Julia).
We already have devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(), so any instances of
of_clk_add_provider() should be replaced with that, instead of
propagating the usage of of_clk_add_provider() any further. I'll gladly
apply patches to convert drivers from struct clk based APIs to struct
clk_hw based APIs so that we can clearly split clk providers from clk
consumers. So if you're interested in working on some coccinelle script
for that it would be great!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists