[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181102231734.GI194472@sasha-vm>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 19:17:34 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 053/143] x86/power: Fix some ordering bugs in
__restore_processor_context()
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:19:36PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>Hi Greg,
>
>On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:51 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
><gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
>This has been fixed by another upstream commit:
>7ee18d677989 ("x86/power: Make restore_processor_context() sane")
>
>You can not directly apply it, will need backporting.
It depends on the following commits:
5b06bbcfc2c6 x86/power: Fix some ordering bugs in __restore_processor_context()
090edbe23ff5 x86/power/64: Use struct desc_ptr for the IDT in struct saved_context
896c80bef4d3 x86/power/32: Move SYSENTER MSR restoration to fix_processor_context()
7ee18d677989 x86/power: Make restore_processor_context() sane
Greg, any objections to pulling them all in?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists