linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: connector: Add self-powered property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Nov 2018 08:44:50 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     badhri@...gle.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        cw00.choi@...sung.com, a.hajda@...sung.com, jun.li@....com,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, jackp@...eaurora.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: connector: Add self-powered property

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:28 AM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:44:59PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> > >From USB_PD_R3_0
> > 7.1.5 Response to Hard Resets
> > Device operation during and after a Hard Reset is defined as follows:
> > Self-powered devices Should Not disconnect from USB during a Hard Reset
> > (see Section 9.1.2).
> > Bus powered devices will disconnect from USB during a Hard Reset due to the
> > loss of their power source.
> >
> > Therefore it is necessary to know whether the port belongs to
> > a device which is self powered or bus powered. This change
> > adds "self-powered" flag to the connector class which present indicates
> > that the port belongs to a device that is self powered. Else it is
> > bus powered usb device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
>
> Rob, I can see you acked one of the patches modifying tcpm.c in this
> series, but did you mean to put the tag to this patch instead?

Hum, indeed. Looks like a scripting fail in my reply. The R-by was for this one.

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Rob