[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181102182905.3klrdw4dxapeoiib@tower>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 07:29:05 +1300
From: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
To: Brajeswar Ghosh <brajeswar.linux@...il.com>
Cc: rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
parri.andrea@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jrdr.linux@...il.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sabyasachi.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/asm/cmpxchg.h: Remove duplicate header
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 08:56:37PM +0530, Brajeswar Ghosh wrote:
> Remove asm/xchg.h which is included more than once
>
> Signed-off-by: Brajeswar Ghosh <brajeswar.linux@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index 6c7c39452471..bcbdac0744f9 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
> #undef ____cmpxchg
> #define ____xchg(type, args...) __xchg ##type(args)
> #define ____cmpxchg(type, args...) __cmpxchg ##type(args)
> -#include <asm/xchg.h>
It's amazing the number of times we get a patch to remove that.
Instead of just automatically removing a second include of a
header file, why don't you take a closer look to see what it
actually does?
Cheers,
Michael.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists