linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.18 106/150] ipv6: rate-limit probes for neighbourless routes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181102182910.664214711@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri,  2 Nov 2018 19:34:28 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 106/150] ipv6: rate-limit probes for neighbourless routes

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>

[ Upstream commit f547fac624be53ad8b07e9ebca7654a7827ba61b ]

When commit 270972554c91 ("[IPV6]: ROUTE: Add Router Reachability
Probing (RFC4191).") introduced router probing, the rt6_probe() function
required that a neighbour entry existed. This neighbour entry is used to
record the timestamp of the last probe via the ->updated field.

Later, commit 2152caea7196 ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().")
removed the requirement for a neighbour entry. Neighbourless routes skip
the interval check and are not rate-limited.

This patch adds rate-limiting for neighbourless routes, by recording the
timestamp of the last probe in the fib6_info itself.

Fixes: 2152caea7196 ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/net/ip6_fib.h |    4 ++++
 net/ipv6/route.c      |   12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
@@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ struct fib6_info {
 	struct rt6_info * __percpu	*rt6i_pcpu;
 	struct rt6_exception_bucket __rcu *rt6i_exception_bucket;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
+	unsigned long			last_probe;
+#endif
+
 	u32				fib6_metric;
 	u8				fib6_protocol;
 	u8				fib6_type;
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -517,10 +517,11 @@ static void rt6_probe_deferred(struct wo
 
 static void rt6_probe(struct fib6_info *rt)
 {
-	struct __rt6_probe_work *work;
+	struct __rt6_probe_work *work = NULL;
 	const struct in6_addr *nh_gw;
 	struct neighbour *neigh;
 	struct net_device *dev;
+	struct inet6_dev *idev;
 
 	/*
 	 * Okay, this does not seem to be appropriate
@@ -536,15 +537,12 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct fib6_info *
 	nh_gw = &rt->fib6_nh.nh_gw;
 	dev = rt->fib6_nh.nh_dev;
 	rcu_read_lock_bh();
+	idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
 	neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, nh_gw);
 	if (neigh) {
-		struct inet6_dev *idev;
-
 		if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
 			goto out;
 
-		idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
-		work = NULL;
 		write_lock(&neigh->lock);
 		if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) &&
 		    time_after(jiffies,
@@ -554,11 +552,13 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct fib6_info *
 				__neigh_set_probe_once(neigh);
 		}
 		write_unlock(&neigh->lock);
-	} else {
+	} else if (time_after(jiffies, rt->last_probe +
+				       idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
 		work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
 	}
 
 	if (work) {
+		rt->last_probe = jiffies;
 		INIT_WORK(&work->work, rt6_probe_deferred);
 		work->target = *nh_gw;
 		dev_hold(dev);