lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  2 Nov 2018 19:35:22 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 137/143] net: drop skb on failure in ip_check_defrag()

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 7de414a9dd91426318df7b63da024b2b07e53df5 ]

Most callers of pskb_trim_rcsum() simply drop the skb when
it fails, however, ip_check_defrag() still continues to pass
the skb up to stack. This is suspicious.

In ip_check_defrag(), after we learn the skb is an IP fragment,
passing the skb to callers makes no sense, because callers expect
fragments are defrag'ed on success. So, dropping the skb when we
can't defrag it is reasonable.

Note, prior to commit 88078d98d1bb, this is not a big problem as
checksum will be fixed up anyway. After it, the checksum is not
correct on failure.

Found this during code review.

Fixes: 88078d98d1bb ("net: pskb_trim_rcsum() and CHECKSUM_COMPLETE are friends")
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -720,10 +720,14 @@ struct sk_buff *ip_check_defrag(struct n
 	if (ip_is_fragment(&iph)) {
 		skb = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (skb) {
-			if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, netoff + iph.ihl * 4))
-				return skb;
-			if (pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, netoff + len))
-				return skb;
+			if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, netoff + iph.ihl * 4)) {
+				kfree_skb(skb);
+				return NULL;
+			}
+			if (pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, netoff + len)) {
+				kfree_skb(skb);
+				return NULL;
+			}
 			memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));
 			if (ip_defrag(net, skb, user))
 				return NULL;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ