linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v15 14/23] x86/cpu/intel: Clear SGX_LC capability if not enabled in FEATURE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VctUJRTecG4rVHXm0uO18ZndMgqJgtNyG25HtSzJF5uzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 3 Nov 2018 15:15:15 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, serge.ayoun@...el.com,
        shay.katz-zamir@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        mark.shanahan@...el.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        davidwang@...oxin.com,
        "Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 14/23] x86/cpu/intel: Clear SGX_LC capability if not
 enabled in FEATURE_CONTROL

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:17 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
>
> Like SGX itself, SGX Launch Control must be explicitly enabled via a
> flag in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL.  Clear the SGX_LC capability if Launch
> Control is not fully enabled (or obviously if SGX itself is disabled).
>
> Note that clearing X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC creates a bit of a conundrum
> regarding the SGXLEPUBKEYHASH MSRs, as it may be desirable to read the
> MSRs even if they are not writable, e.g. to query the configured key,
> but clearing the capability leaves no breadcrum for discerning whether
> or not the MSRs exist.  But, such usage will be rare (KVM is the only
> known case at this time) and not performance critical, so it's not
> unreasonable to require the use of rdmsr_safe().  Clearing the cap bit
> eliminates the need for an additional flag to track whether or not
> Launch Control is truly enabled, which is what we care about the vast
> majority of the time.

> @@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ static void detect_sgx(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>                 setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX1);
>                 setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX2);
>         }
> +       if (unsupported || !(fc & FEATURE_CONTROL_SGX_LE_WR))
> +               setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC);
>  }

A-ha, I see how you use this variable here (though it's still possible
to get rid of it, choose what is better for readability /
maintenance).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko