linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] genirq/matrix: Choose CPU for managed IRQs based on how many of them are allocated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1811031604540.3160@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 3 Nov 2018 16:06:04 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] genirq/matrix: Choose CPU for managed IRQs based on
 how many of them are allocated

Long,

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Long Li wrote:
>  /**
>   * irq_matrix_assign_system - Assign system wide entry in the matrix
>   * @m:		Matrix pointer
> @@ -269,7 +291,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,
>  	if (cpumask_empty(msk))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	cpu = matrix_find_best_cpu(m, msk);
> +	cpu = matrix_find_best_cpu_managed(m, msk);
>  	if (cpu == UINT_MAX)
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  
> @@ -282,6 +304,7 @@ int irq_matrix_alloc_managed(struct irq_matrix *m, const struct cpumask *msk,
>  		return -ENOSPC;
>  	set_bit(bit, cm->alloc_map);
>  	cm->allocated++;
> +	cm->managed_allocated++;
>  	m->total_allocated++;
>  	*mapped_cpu = cpu;
>  	trace_irq_matrix_alloc_managed(bit, cpu, m, cm);

so far so good. But what exactly decrements managed_allocated ?

Thanks,

	tglx