linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 069/143] ARM: tegra: Fix ULPI regression on Tegra20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Nov 2018 22:02:24 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com,
        digetx@...il.com, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 069/143] ARM: tegra: Fix ULPI regression on Tegra20

On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 07:56:57PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>Hi Greg,
>
>On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 6:53 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
><gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> 4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
>It seems this has already been reverted upstream:
>9bf4e370048d ("ARM: dts: tegra20: Revert "Fix ULPI regression on Tegra20"")

The commit log of 9bf4e370048d suggests that this issue was fixed
somewhere else which made 9bf4e370048d unnecessary. Can someone point to
that fix? If not, I'll just revert this commit.

--
Thanks,
Sasha