[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8965ea1d-c29f-7bdf-44cb-874511899567@suse.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 11:01:14 +0200
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To: hmsjwzb <weizhefix@...il.com>
Cc: clm@...com, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change the total_dirty from SZ_256M to SZ_64M.
On 3.11.18 г. 10:36 ч., hmsjwzb wrote:
> The SZ_256M will cause trouble in platform with less than 256M memory.
> For example, a qemu virtual machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: hmsjwzb <weizhefix@...il.com>
If you have actually taken the care to understand the code in
test_find_delalloc you would have seen that total_dirty and max_bytes
are actually inter-dependent so you cannot really change total_bytes
without adjusting max_bytes as well. Otherwise tests will start breaking.
NACK on this (and likely any future postings of this) since the tests
are sized in a such a way so as to test design limits (such as the max
extent size which is 128MB)
> ---
> fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> index 9e0f4a01be14..cb23dce96a2d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int test_find_delalloc(u32 sectorsize)
> struct page *page;
> struct page *locked_page = NULL;
> unsigned long index = 0;
> - u64 total_dirty = SZ_256M;
> + u64 total_dirty = SZ_64M;
> u64 max_bytes = SZ_128M;
> u64 start, end, test_start;
> u64 found;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists