[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181104135240.88431-2-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 08:51:57 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.18 02/45] mm: thp: fix mmu_notifier in migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page()
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit 7066f0f933a1fd707bb38781866657769cff7efc ]
change_huge_pmd() after arming the numa/protnone pmd doesn't flush the TLB
right away. do_huge_pmd_numa_page() flushes the TLB before calling
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(). By the time do_huge_pmd_numa_page()
runs some CPU could still access the page through the TLB.
change_huge_pmd() before arming the numa/protnone transhuge pmd calls
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(). So there's no need of
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start()/mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end()
sequence in migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() too, because by the time
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() runs, the pmd mapping has already been
invalidated in the secondary MMUs. It has to or if a secondary MMU can
still write to the page, the migrate_page_copy() would lose data.
However an explicit mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() is needed before
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page() starts copying the data of the
transhuge page or the below can happen for MMU notifier users sharing the
primary MMU pagetables and only implementing ->invalidate_range:
CPU0 CPU1 GPU sharing linux pagetables using
only ->invalidate_range
----------- ------------ ---------
GPU secondary MMU writes to the page
mapped by the transhuge pmd
change_pmd_range()
mmu..._range_start()
->invalidate_range_start() noop
change_huge_pmd()
set_pmd_at(numa/protnone)
pmd_unlock()
do_huge_pmd_numa_page()
CPU TLB flush globally (1)
CPU cannot write to page
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page()
GPU writes to the page...
migrate_page_copy()
...GPU stops writing to the page
CPU TLB flush (2)
mmu..._range_end() (3)
->invalidate_range_stop() noop
->invalidate_range()
GPU secondary MMU is invalidated
and cannot write to the page anymore
(too late)
Just like we need a CPU TLB flush (1) because the TLB flush (2) arrives
too late, we also need a mmu_notifier_invalidate_range() before calling
migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(), because the ->invalidate_range() in
(3) also arrives too late.
This requirement is the result of the lazy optimization in
change_huge_pmd() that releases the pmd_lock without first flushing the
TLB and without first calling mmu_notifier_invalidate_range().
Even converting the removed mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end() into
a mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() would not have been enough to fix
this, because it run after migrate_page_copy().
After the hugepage data copy is done migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page()
can proceed and call set_pmd_at without having to flush the TLB nor any
secondary MMUs because the secondary MMU invalidate, just like the CPU TLB
flush, has to happen before the migrate_page_copy() is called or it would
be a bug in the first place (and it was for drivers using
->invalidate_range()).
KVM is unaffected because it doesn't implement ->invalidate_range().
The standard PAGE_SIZEd migrate_misplaced_page is less accelerated and
uses the generic migrate_pages which transitions the pte from
numa/protnone to a migration entry in try_to_unmap_one() and flushes TLBs
and all mmu notifiers there before copying the page.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181013002430.698-3-aarcange@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
mm/migrate.c | 19 ++++++-------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 3238bb2d0c93..d8d46936e39e 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1560,8 +1560,20 @@ int do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf, pmd_t pmd)
* We are not sure a pending tlb flush here is for a huge page
* mapping or not. Hence use the tlb range variant
*/
- if (mm_tlb_flush_pending(vma->vm_mm))
+ if (mm_tlb_flush_pending(vma->vm_mm)) {
flush_tlb_range(vma, haddr, haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
+ /*
+ * change_huge_pmd() released the pmd lock before
+ * invalidating the secondary MMUs sharing the primary
+ * MMU pagetables (with ->invalidate_range()). The
+ * mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() (which
+ * internally calls ->invalidate_range()) in
+ * change_pmd_range() will run after us, so we can't
+ * rely on it here and we need an explicit invalidate.
+ */
+ mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(vma->vm_mm, haddr,
+ haddr + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
+ }
/*
* Migrate the THP to the requested node, returns with page unlocked
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 1990d1ccee29..7d8834d80bc5 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -2022,8 +2022,8 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
int isolated = 0;
struct page *new_page = NULL;
int page_lru = page_is_file_cache(page);
- unsigned long mmun_start = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
- unsigned long mmun_end = mmun_start + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
+ unsigned long start = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
+ unsigned long end = start + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
/*
* Rate-limit the amount of data that is being migrated to a node.
@@ -2058,11 +2058,9 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
WARN_ON(PageLRU(new_page));
/* Recheck the target PMD */
- mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);
ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
if (unlikely(!pmd_same(*pmd, entry) || !page_ref_freeze(page, 2))) {
spin_unlock(ptl);
- mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);
/* Reverse changes made by migrate_page_copy() */
if (TestClearPageActive(new_page))
@@ -2093,8 +2091,8 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
* new page and page_add_new_anon_rmap guarantee the copy is
* visible before the pagetable update.
*/
- flush_cache_range(vma, mmun_start, mmun_end);
- page_add_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, mmun_start, true);
+ flush_cache_range(vma, start, end);
+ page_add_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, start, true);
/*
* At this point the pmd is numa/protnone (i.e. non present) and the TLB
* has already been flushed globally. So no TLB can be currently
@@ -2106,7 +2104,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
* MADV_DONTNEED won't wait on the pmd lock and it'll skip clearing this
* pmd.
*/
- set_pmd_at(mm, mmun_start, pmd, entry);
+ set_pmd_at(mm, start, pmd, entry);
update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, &entry);
page_ref_unfreeze(page, 2);
@@ -2115,11 +2113,6 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
set_page_owner_migrate_reason(new_page, MR_NUMA_MISPLACED);
spin_unlock(ptl);
- /*
- * No need to double call mmu_notifier->invalidate_range() callback as
- * the above pmdp_huge_clear_flush_notify() did already call it.
- */
- mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);
/* Take an "isolate" reference and put new page on the LRU. */
get_page(new_page);
@@ -2144,7 +2137,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
if (pmd_same(*pmd, entry)) {
entry = pmd_modify(entry, vma->vm_page_prot);
- set_pmd_at(mm, mmun_start, pmd, entry);
+ set_pmd_at(mm, start, pmd, entry);
update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, &entry);
}
spin_unlock(ptl);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists