[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154130064120.88331.5081431734592584205@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 20:04:01 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
Cc: Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
Victor Wan <victor.wan@...ogic.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Qiufang Dai <qiufang.dai@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: meson: add DT documentation for emmc clock controller
Quoting Yixun Lan (2018-10-25 00:29:15)
> yes, I think the documentation need to be fixed
>
> for the final solution, we decide to make 'mmc-clkc' an independent node
> instead of being a sub-node of 'mmc', so both of them may exist in parallel..
>
> the DT part may like this:
>
> sd_emmc_c_clkc: clock-controller@...0 {
> compatible = "amlogic,axg-mmc-clkc", "syscon";
> reg = <0x0 0x7000 0x0 0x4>;
> ...
> };
>
> sd_emmc_c: mmc@...0 {
> compatible = "amlogic,axg-mmc";
> reg = <0x0 0x7000 0x0 0x800>;
> ...
> };
That's improper usage of DT. We don't want two devices at the same
register offset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists