linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 13/57] powerpc/mm: fix always true/false warning in slice.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181104135144.88324-13-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun,  4 Nov 2018 08:51:00 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 13/57] powerpc/mm: fix always true/false warning in slice.c

From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>

[ Upstream commit 37e9c674e7e6f445e12cb1151017bd4bacdd1e2d ]

This patch fixes the following warnings (obtained with make W=1).

arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c: In function 'slice_range_to_mask':
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:73:12: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (start < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
            ^
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:81:20: error: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if ((start + len) > SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
                    ^
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c: In function 'slice_mask_for_free':
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:136:17: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (high_limit <= SLICE_LOW_TOP)
                 ^
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c: In function 'slice_check_range_fits':
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:185:12: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (start < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
            ^
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:195:39: error: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && ((start + len) > SLICE_LOW_TOP)) {
                                       ^
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c: In function 'slice_scan_available':
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:306:11: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (addr < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
           ^
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c: In function 'get_slice_psize':
arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c:709:11: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
  if (addr < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
           ^

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
index 205fe557ca10..4f213ba33491 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
@@ -61,6 +61,13 @@ static void slice_print_mask(const char *label, const struct slice_mask *mask) {
 
 #endif
 
+static inline bool slice_addr_is_low(unsigned long addr)
+{
+	u64 tmp = (u64)addr;
+
+	return tmp < SLICE_LOW_TOP;
+}
+
 static void slice_range_to_mask(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
 				struct slice_mask *ret)
 {
@@ -70,7 +77,7 @@ static void slice_range_to_mask(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
 	if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH)
 		bitmap_zero(ret->high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
 
-	if (start < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+	if (slice_addr_is_low(start)) {
 		unsigned long mend = min(end,
 					 (unsigned long)(SLICE_LOW_TOP - 1));
 
@@ -78,7 +85,7 @@ static void slice_range_to_mask(unsigned long start, unsigned long len,
 			- (1u << GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX(start));
 	}
 
-	if ((start + len) > SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+	if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && !slice_addr_is_low(end)) {
 		unsigned long start_index = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(start);
 		unsigned long align_end = ALIGN(end, (1UL << SLICE_HIGH_SHIFT));
 		unsigned long count = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(align_end) - start_index;
@@ -133,7 +140,7 @@ static void slice_mask_for_free(struct mm_struct *mm, struct slice_mask *ret,
 		if (!slice_low_has_vma(mm, i))
 			ret->low_slices |= 1u << i;
 
-	if (high_limit <= SLICE_LOW_TOP)
+	if (slice_addr_is_low(high_limit - 1))
 		return;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(high_limit); i++)
@@ -182,7 +189,7 @@ static bool slice_check_range_fits(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	unsigned long end = start + len - 1;
 	u64 low_slices = 0;
 
-	if (start < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+	if (slice_addr_is_low(start)) {
 		unsigned long mend = min(end,
 					 (unsigned long)(SLICE_LOW_TOP - 1));
 
@@ -192,7 +199,7 @@ static bool slice_check_range_fits(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	if ((low_slices & available->low_slices) != low_slices)
 		return false;
 
-	if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && ((start + len) > SLICE_LOW_TOP)) {
+	if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH && !slice_addr_is_low(end)) {
 		unsigned long start_index = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(start);
 		unsigned long align_end = ALIGN(end, (1UL << SLICE_HIGH_SHIFT));
 		unsigned long count = GET_HIGH_SLICE_INDEX(align_end) - start_index;
@@ -303,7 +310,7 @@ static bool slice_scan_available(unsigned long addr,
 				 int end, unsigned long *boundary_addr)
 {
 	unsigned long slice;
-	if (addr < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+	if (slice_addr_is_low(addr)) {
 		slice = GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX(addr);
 		*boundary_addr = (slice + end) << SLICE_LOW_SHIFT;
 		return !!(available->low_slices & (1u << slice));
@@ -706,7 +713,7 @@ unsigned int get_slice_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(radix_enabled());
 
-	if (addr < SLICE_LOW_TOP) {
+	if (slice_addr_is_low(addr)) {
 		psizes = mm->context.low_slices_psize;
 		index = GET_LOW_SLICE_INDEX(addr);
 	} else {
-- 
2.17.1