linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/143] 4.14.79-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 4 Nov 2018 09:44:48 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/143] 4.14.79-stable review

On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 20:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 07:31:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 11/2/18 11:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.79 release.
> > > There are 143 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Nov  4 18:27:59 UTC 2018.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> >
> > Build results:
> >       total: 150 pass: 149 fail: 1
> > Failed builds:
> >       xtensa:allmodconfig
> > Qemu test results:
> >       total: 318 pass: 318 fail: 0\
> >
> > Build failure:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/mlx5/port.h:36:0,
> >                  from include/linux/mlx5/driver.h: In function ‘mlx5_get_vector_affinity_hint’:
> > include/linux/mlx5/driver.h:1208:13: error:
> >       ‘struct irq_desc’ has no member named ‘affinity_hint’
> >
> > Caused by commit 19b743c448db ("net/mlx5: Fix mlx5_get_vector_affinity function").
>
> Odd, this should be fixed by a later patch in the same queue, as 0 day
> also reported this.
>
> Yes, e3ca34880652 ("net/mlx5: Fix build break when CONFIG_SMP=n") in the
> 4.14 tree should resolve this.  Ah, Sasha added it at the "last minute"
> after I did the -rc1 release.  So this should be resolved now, I'll push
> out a -rc2 so that it can be verified...

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64 and i386.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.14.79-rc2
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.14.y
git commit: b825fd9fbad594b1eb7f4ba22588e33f00bca345
git describe: v4.14.78-144-gb825fd9fbad5
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.14-oe/build/v4.14.78-144-gb825fd9fbad5

No regressions (compared to build v4.14.78-144-g02f369a75b6e)


>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h