linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/i915: Fix threshold check in intel_hpd_irq_storm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181105222011.2913-4-lyude@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon,  5 Nov 2018 17:20:09 -0500
From:   Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To:     intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Ville Syrjälä 
        <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/i915: Fix threshold check in intel_hpd_irq_storm_detect()

Currently in intel_hpd_irq_storm_detect() when we detect that the last
recorded hotplug wasn't within the period defined by
HPD_STORM_DETECT_DELAY, we make the mistake of resetting the HPD count
to 0 without incrementing it. This results in us only enabling storm
detection when we go +2 above the threshold, e.g. an HPD threshold of 5
would not trigger a storm until we reach a total of 7 hotplugs.

So: rework the code a bit so we reset the HPD count when
HPD_STORM_DETECT_DELAY has passed, then increment the count afterwards.
Also, clean things up a bit to make it easier to undertand.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c
index 8326900a311e..c11d73de16f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c
@@ -135,24 +135,27 @@ enum hpd_pin intel_hpd_pin_default(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 static bool intel_hpd_irq_storm_detect(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				       enum hpd_pin pin)
 {
-	unsigned long start = dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].last_jiffies;
+	struct i915_hotplug *hpd = &dev_priv->hotplug;
+	unsigned long start = hpd->stats[pin].last_jiffies;
 	unsigned long end = start + msecs_to_jiffies(HPD_STORM_DETECT_PERIOD);
-	const int threshold = dev_priv->hotplug.hpd_storm_threshold;
+	const int threshold = hpd->hpd_storm_threshold;
 	bool storm = false;
 
+	if (!threshold)
+		return false;
+
 	if (!time_in_range(jiffies, start, end)) {
-		dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].last_jiffies = jiffies;
-		dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].count = 0;
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Received HPD interrupt on PIN %d - cnt: 0\n", pin);
-	} else if (dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].count > threshold &&
-		   threshold) {
-		dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].state = HPD_MARK_DISABLED;
+		hpd->stats[pin].last_jiffies = jiffies;
+		hpd->stats[pin].count = 0;
+	}
+
+	if (++hpd->stats[pin].count > threshold) {
+		hpd->stats[pin].state = HPD_MARK_DISABLED;
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("HPD interrupt storm detected on PIN %d\n", pin);
 		storm = true;
 	} else {
-		dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].count++;
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Received HPD interrupt on PIN %d - cnt: %d\n", pin,
-			      dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].count);
+			      hpd->stats[pin].count);
 	}
 
 	return storm;
-- 
2.19.1