linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the xtensa tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181106101941.458c46f8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:19:41 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the xtensa tree

Hi Max,

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:14:44 -0800 Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:09 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Commit
> >
> >   12e90ddd8dbf ("Revert "xtensa: xtfpga: implement platform DMA address helpers"")
> >
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer.
> >
> > Reverts are commits too.  
> 
> Thanks for catching that. Should I rewrite that branch fixing up that commit?

There is nothing else you can do.  The only reason not to is if you
strictly do not rebase your branch (or there has been lots of other
activity - which there is not in this case).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped