[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154138144774.31651.16441435015576031050.stgit@noble>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:30:47 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@...dspring.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] NFS: use locks_copy_lock() to copy locks.
Using memcpy() to copy lock requests leave the various
list_head in an inconsistent state.
As we will soon attach a list of conflicting request to
another pending request, we need these lists to be consistent.
So change NFS to use locks_init_lock/locks_copy_lock instead
of memcpy.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 867457d6dfbe..0ba2b0fb8ff3 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -6311,7 +6311,8 @@ static struct nfs4_unlockdata *nfs4_alloc_unlockdata(struct file_lock *fl,
/* Ensure we don't close file until we're done freeing locks! */
p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx);
p->l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(ctx);
- memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl));
+ locks_init_lock(&p->fl);
+ locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl);
p->server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
return p;
}
@@ -6533,7 +6534,8 @@ static struct nfs4_lockdata *nfs4_alloc_lockdata(struct file_lock *fl,
p->server = server;
refcount_inc(&lsp->ls_count);
p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx);
- memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl));
+ locks_init_lock(&p->fl);
+ locks_copy_lock(&p->fl, fl);
return p;
out_free_seqid:
nfs_free_seqid(p->arg.open_seqid);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists