[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154138144781.31651.17310735797908337300.stgit@noble>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:30:47 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@...dspring.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] ocfs2: properly initial file_lock used for unlock.
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/locks.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/locks.c b/fs/ocfs2/locks.c
index d56f0079b858..9bb978d57c7d 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/locks.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/locks.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static int ocfs2_do_flock(struct file *file, struct inode *inode,
if (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_ATTACHED &&
lockres->l_level > LKM_NLMODE) {
int old_level = 0;
+ struct file_lock request;
if (lockres->l_level == LKM_EXMODE)
old_level = 1;
@@ -66,11 +67,10 @@ static int ocfs2_do_flock(struct file *file, struct inode *inode,
* level.
*/
- locks_lock_file_wait(file,
- &(struct file_lock) {
- .fl_type = F_UNLCK,
- .fl_flags = FL_FLOCK
- });
+ locks_init_lock(&request);
+ request.fl_type = F_UNLOCK;
+ request.fl_flags = FL_FLOCK;
+ locks_lock_file_wait(file, &request);
ocfs2_file_unlock(file);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists