[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181105105548.GC12367@ming.t460p>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:55:50 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:23:01AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> With drivers like iSer we are seeing a lot of bio splitting and smaller I/Os
> being submitted to the driver.
>
> The root cause of this issue that the virtual boundary mask code does not take
> into consideration that some of the memory segments in the SG list may have
> come from a huge memory page that is being managed in the SG list as 4K
I guess you mean something like 64K PAGE_SIZE, instead of huge page.
> blocks. This means that many of the segments in the SG list will have an
> offset into the page that is not 0 but will be a multiple of 4K.
>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
> ---
> block/blk-merge.c | 2 +-
> block/blk.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 6b5ad275ed56..208658a901c6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static inline bool bio_will_gap(struct request_queue *q,
> bio_get_first_bvec(prev_rq->bio, &pb);
> else
> bio_get_first_bvec(prev, &pb);
> - if (pb.bv_offset)
> + if (pb.bv_offset & queue_virt_boundary(q))
> return true;
The change should only make difference in case that PAGE_SIZE is bigger
than 4K. If yes, please add the description in commit log.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists