linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/7] lightnvm: pblk: account for write error sectors in emeta

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181105114113.30932-3-hans.ml.holmberg@cnexlabs.com>
Date:   Mon,  5 Nov 2018 12:41:08 +0100
From:   Hans Holmberg <hans@...tronix.com>
To:     Matias Bjorling <mb@...htnvm.io>
Cc:     Javier Gonzales <javier@...xlabs.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Hans Holmberg <hans.ml.holmberg@...tronix.com>,
        Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...xlabs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] lightnvm: pblk: account for write error sectors in emeta

From: Hans Holmberg <hans.ml.holmberg@...tronix.com>

From: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...xlabs.com>

Lines inflicted with write errors lines might be recovered
if they have not been recycled after write error garbage collection.

Ensure that the emeta accounting of valid lbas is correct
for such lines to avoid recovery inconsistencies.

Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...xlabs.com>
---
 drivers/lightnvm/pblk-write.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-write.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-write.c
index 3ddd16f47106..750f04b8a227 100644
--- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-write.c
+++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-write.c
@@ -105,14 +105,20 @@ static void pblk_complete_write(struct pblk *pblk, struct nvm_rq *rqd,
 }
 
 /* Map remaining sectors in chunk, starting from ppa */
-static void pblk_map_remaining(struct pblk *pblk, struct ppa_addr *ppa)
+static void pblk_map_remaining(struct pblk *pblk, struct ppa_addr *ppa,
+		int rqd_ppas)
 {
 	struct pblk_line *line;
 	struct ppa_addr map_ppa = *ppa;
+	__le64 addr_empty = cpu_to_le64(ADDR_EMPTY);
+	__le64 *lba_list;
 	u64 paddr;
 	int done = 0;
+	int n = 0;
 
 	line = pblk_ppa_to_line(pblk, *ppa);
+	lba_list = emeta_to_lbas(pblk, line->emeta->buf);
+
 	spin_lock(&line->lock);
 
 	while (!done)  {
@@ -121,10 +127,17 @@ static void pblk_map_remaining(struct pblk *pblk, struct ppa_addr *ppa)
 		if (!test_and_set_bit(paddr, line->map_bitmap))
 			line->left_msecs--;
 
+		if (n < rqd_ppas && lba_list[paddr] != addr_empty)
+			line->nr_valid_lbas--;
+
+		lba_list[paddr] = addr_empty;
+
 		if (!test_and_set_bit(paddr, line->invalid_bitmap))
 			le32_add_cpu(line->vsc, -1);
 
 		done = nvm_next_ppa_in_chk(pblk->dev, &map_ppa);
+
+		n++;
 	}
 
 	line->w_err_gc->has_write_err = 1;
@@ -202,7 +215,7 @@ static void pblk_submit_rec(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	pblk_log_write_err(pblk, rqd);
 
-	pblk_map_remaining(pblk, ppa_list);
+	pblk_map_remaining(pblk, ppa_list, rqd->nr_ppas);
 	pblk_queue_resubmit(pblk, c_ctx);
 
 	pblk_up_rq(pblk, c_ctx->lun_bitmap);
-- 
2.17.1