linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] irq: fix support for allocating sets of IRQs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181105021807.GC13699@ming.t460p>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:18:08 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] irq: fix support for allocating sets of IRQs

On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 01:02:18PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Jens,
> 
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2018, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> > On 11/2/18 8:59 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Hi Jens,
> > > 
> > > As I mentioned, there are at least two issues in the patch of '
> > > irq: add support for allocating (and affinitizing) sets of IRQs':
> > > 
> > > 1) it is wrong to pass 'mask + usedvec' to irq_build_affinity_masks()
> > > 
> > > 2) we should spread all possible CPUs in 2-stage way on each set of IRQs
> > > 
> > > The fix isn't trivial, and I introduce two extra patches as preparation,
> > > then the implementation can be more clean.
> > > 
> > > The patchset is against mq-maps branch of block tree, feel free to
> > > integrate into the whole patchset of multiple queue maps.
> > 
> > Thanks Ming, I ran this through my testing, and I end up with the
> > same maps and affinities for all the cases I cared about. I'm going
> > to drop my initial version, and add the three.
> 
> So I assume, that I can pick up Mings series instead.
> 
> There is another patch pending affecting the irq affinity spreading. Can
> you folks please have a look at it?
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181102180248.13583-1-longli@linuxonhyperv.com

This patch looks fine.

It ensures that all CPUs are covered in irq's affinity when required
vector number is <= nr_numa_nodes.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>


Thanks,
Ming