[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181105143415.GA2798@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:35:46 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
npmccallum@...hat.com, serge.ayoun@...el.com,
shay.katz-zamir@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
mark.shanahan@...el.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 11/23] x86/sgx: Add definitions for SGX's CPUID leaf
and variable sub-leafs
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 03:11:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:16 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > SGX defines its own CPUID leaf, 0x12, along with a variable number of
> > sub-leafs. Sub-leafs 0 and 1 are always available if SGX is supported
> > and enumerate various SGX features, e.g. instruction sets and enclave
> > capabilities. Sub-leafs 2+ are variable, both in their existence and
> > in what they enumerate. Bits 3:0 of EAX report the sub-leaf type,
> > with the remaining bits in EAX, EBX, ECX and EDX being type-specific.
> > Currently, the only known sub-leaf type enumerates an EPC section. An
> > EPC section is simply a range of EPC memory available to software.
> > The "list" of varaible SGX sub-leafs is NULL-terminated, i.e. software
> > is expected to query CPUID until an invalid sub-leaf is encountered.
>
> > + SGX_CPUID_SUB_LEAF_TYPE_MASK = 0xF,
>
> GENMASK() if it suits here?
>
> P.S. Btw, BIT() and GENMASK() macros are now in a separate header,
> i.e. linux/bits.h, perhaps you might need to revisit code to include
> it explicitly
Agreed. I would also think that is should be renamed simply as
SGX_CPUID_SUBLEAF_MASK.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists