lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJzszbMOZAj_K0tfBV-3Rs67_gedHd+RwSXvzY38Fu3dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:04:13 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] pstore/ram: Correctly calculate usable PRZ bytes

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> Dumping the magic bytes of the non decompressable .enc.z files, I get this
> which shows a valid zlib compressed header:
>
> Something like:
> 48 89 85 54 4d 6f 1a 31
>
> The 0b1000 in the first byte means it is "deflate". The file tool indeed
> successfully shows "zlib compressed data" and I did the math for the header
> and it is indeed valid. So I don't think the data is insane. The buffer has
> enough room because even the very small dumps are not decompressable.

Interesting. So the kernel wouldn't decompress it even though it's the
right algo and untruncated? That seems worth fixing.

> At this point we can park this issue I guess, but a scenario that is still
> broken is:
> Say someone crashes the system on compress algo X and then recompiles with
> compress algo Y, then the decompress would fail no?
>
> One way to fix that is to store the comrpession method in buffer as well,
> then initialize all algorithms at boot and choose the right one in the
> buffer ideally. Otherwise atleast we should print a message saying "buffer is
> encoded with algo X but compression selected is Y" or something. But I agree
> its a very low priority "doctor it hurts if I do this" kind of issue :)

Right, this is fine: if algos change across a kernel version, I'm fine
with it failing. pstore isn't expected to work sanely outside of a
pretty narrow set of use-cases.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ