[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi8BNNTp+Xt4ROz1TqGgFT-c6-Hmmc9yW0B6p2FTFwJTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:50:09 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: rong.a.chen@...el.com
Cc: yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org, ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mm] 9bc8039e71: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -64.1% regression
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 9:08 PM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed a -64.1% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
> due to commit 9bc8039e715d ("mm: brk: downgrade mmap_sem to read when
> shrinking")
Ugh. That looks pretty bad.
> in testcase: will-it-scale
> on test machine: 8 threads Ivy Bridge with 16G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> nr_task: 100%
> mode: thread
> test: brk1
> ucode: 0x20
> cpufreq_governor: performance
The reason seems to be way more scheduler time due to lots more
context switches:
> 34925294 ± 18% +270.3% 1.293e+08 ± 4% will-it-scale.time.voluntary_context_switches
Yang Shi, would you mind taking a look at what's going on?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists