[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181105.101610.1437737564548154497.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:16:10 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: starnight@...cu.edu.tw
Cc: afaerber@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
marcel@...tmann.org, dollar.chen@...ec.com, ken.yu@...wireless.com,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, stefan@...enfreihafen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] net: lorawan: Add LoRaWAN socket module
From: Jian-Hong Pan <starnight@...cu.edu.tw>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:55:40 +0800
> +static inline struct lrw_mac_cb * mac_cb(struct sk_buff *skb)
"mac_cb()" is pretty generic for a name, and leads to namespace pollution,
please use lrw_mac_cb() or similar.
> +static inline struct dgram_sock *
> +dgram_sk(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return container_of(sk, struct dgram_sock, sk);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct net_device *
> +lrw_get_dev_by_addr(struct net *net, u32 devaddr)
Never use inline for functions in a foo.c file, let the compiler decide.
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = NULL;
> + __be32 be_addr = cpu_to_be32(devaddr);
Always order local variables from longest to shortest line.
> +static int
> +dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> + int noblock, int flags, int *addr_len)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + size_t copied = 0;
> + DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_lorawan *, saddr, msg->msg_name);
> + int err;
Likewise.
I'm not going to point out every single place where you have made these
two errors.
Please audit your entire submission and fix the problems wherever they
occur.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists