linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 04/10] sched/fair: Dynamically update cfs_overload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1541448489-19692-5-git-send-email-steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Date:   Mon,  5 Nov 2018 12:08:03 -0800
From:   Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
To:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com, dhaval.giani@...cle.com,
        daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com,
        matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com,
        riel@...hat.com, jbacik@...com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        valentin.schneider@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        quentin.perret@....com, steven.sistare@...cle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] sched/fair: Dynamically update cfs_overload_cpus

An overloaded CPU has more than 1 runnable task.  When a CFS task wakes
on a CPU, if h_nr_running transitions from 1 to more, then set the CPU in
the cfs_overload_cpus bitmap.  When a CFS task sleeps, if h_nr_running
transitions from 2 to less, then clear the CPU in cfs_overload_cpus.

Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7fc4a37..c623338 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "sched.h"
 
 #include <trace/events/sched.h>
+#include <linux/sparsemask.h>
 
 /*
  * Targeted preemption latency for CPU-bound tasks:
@@ -3723,6 +3724,28 @@ static inline bool within_margin(int value, int margin)
 	WRITE_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est, ue);
 }
 
+static void overload_clear(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	struct sparsemask *overload_cpus;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	overload_cpus = rcu_dereference(rq->cfs_overload_cpus);
+	if (overload_cpus)
+		sparsemask_clear_elem(rq->cpu, overload_cpus);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static void overload_set(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	struct sparsemask *overload_cpus;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	overload_cpus = rcu_dereference(rq->cfs_overload_cpus);
+	if (overload_cpus)
+		sparsemask_set_elem(rq->cpu, overload_cpus);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 #define UPDATE_TG	0x0
@@ -3746,6 +3769,9 @@ static inline int idle_balance(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline void overload_clear(struct rq *rq) {}
+static inline void overload_set(struct rq *rq) {}
+
 static inline void
 util_est_enqueue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
 
@@ -4439,6 +4465,7 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
 static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+	unsigned int prev_nr = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
 	struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
 	struct sched_entity *se;
 	long task_delta, dequeue = 1;
@@ -4466,8 +4493,12 @@ static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 			dequeue = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!se)
+	if (!se) {
 		sub_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
+		if (prev_nr >= 2 && prev_nr - task_delta < 2)
+			overload_clear(rq);
+
+	}
 
 	cfs_rq->throttled = 1;
 	cfs_rq->throttled_clock = rq_clock(rq);
@@ -4493,6 +4524,7 @@ static void throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+	unsigned int prev_nr = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
 	struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
 	struct sched_entity *se;
 	int enqueue = 1;
@@ -4529,8 +4561,11 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 			break;
 	}
 
-	if (!se)
+	if (!se) {
 		add_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
+		if (prev_nr < 2 && prev_nr + task_delta >= 2)
+			overload_set(rq);
+	}
 
 	/* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */
 	if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->cfs.nr_running)
@@ -5064,6 +5099,7 @@ static inline void hrtick_update(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
 	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
+	unsigned int prev_nr = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
 
 	/*
 	 * The code below (indirectly) updates schedutil which looks at
@@ -5111,8 +5147,12 @@ static inline void hrtick_update(struct rq *rq)
 		update_cfs_group(se);
 	}
 
-	if (!se)
+	if (!se) {
 		add_nr_running(rq, 1);
+		if (prev_nr == 1)
+			overload_set(rq);
+
+	}
 
 	hrtick_update(rq);
 }
@@ -5129,6 +5169,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
 	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
 	int task_sleep = flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
+	unsigned int prev_nr = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
 
 	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
 		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
@@ -5170,8 +5211,11 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 		update_cfs_group(se);
 	}
 
-	if (!se)
+	if (!se) {
 		sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
+		if (prev_nr == 2)
+			overload_clear(rq);
+	}
 
 	util_est_dequeue(&rq->cfs, p, task_sleep);
 	hrtick_update(rq);
-- 
1.8.3.1