linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:57:16 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:17 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 05:50:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> >
> > For drm_modes.c, the full node path is already printed out, so printing
> > just the node name a 2nd time is redundant and can be removed.
> >
> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
> > Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Add to commit msg that we're dropping redundant printing of node name.
>
> Applied, thanks for the patch.

It appears this hasn't been.

> Aside, still don't want drm-misc commit rights so you can offload these
> yourself?

No thanks.

Rob