[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181106055250.GB15575@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 07:52:50 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] tpm: use tpm_buf in tpm_transmit_cmd() as the
IO parameter
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 04:48:13PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > int tpm_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, void *cmd, size_t buflen)
> > {
> > + struct tpm_buf buf;
> > int rc;
> >
> > chip = tpm_find_get_ops(chip);
> > if (!chip)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > - rc = tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, NULL, cmd, buflen, 0, 0,
> > + rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, 0, 0);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + memcpy(buf.data, cmd, buflen);
>
>
> Nit: buflen -> cmd_len
Agreed that it should but I try to keep the patch as minimal and
mechanical as I can.
Thank you.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists