[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181106105803.GS10650@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:58:03 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/property: Introduce of_fwnode_name()
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:50:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:17 AM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > +static const char *of_fwnode_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > +{
> > + return to_of_node(fwnode)->name;
>
> I'm trying to get rid of the DT name ptr, so please don't add one. You
> can use of_node_full_name() here instead if "<name>@<unit-address>"
> instead of <name> is fine. Otherwise, you've got to allocate your own
> storage and use "%pOFn" printf specifier.
If we do this here, we will change a behaviour of the entire set of
of_fwnode_get_named_child_node() users.
I think this is out of scope of the series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists