[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181106113538.GK22431@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 12:35:38 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, luto@...capital.net,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 04/12] cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.partition flag
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:29:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> + * Called with cpuset_mutex held.
> + */
> +static int update_parent_subparts_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset, int cmd,
> + struct cpumask *newmask,
> + struct tmpmasks *tmp)
> +{
> + struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cpuset);
> + int adding; /* Moving cpus from effective_cpus to subparts_cpus */
> + int deleting; /* Moving cpus from subparts_cpus to effective_cpus */
> +
I much prefer doing away with that "called with * held" comment crud and
add:
lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists