[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181106121023.GF13712@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:10:23 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@...il.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, keescook@...omium.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
indou.takao@...fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit kaslr
in immovable memory
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:40:51AM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
> My actual use case is for EFI boxes, however, I think it's better to useful
> for legacy BIOS as well because memory hot-plug affinity in SRAT and KASLR
> are available on legacy BIOS.
> Actually, we can create such environment in qemu.
Ah, right, qemu. :)
> I have another idea to solve this issue. Adding a SRAT parsing code
> to arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c. It is useful for both EFI and BIOS and
> also we don't need a new kernel parameter...
> Dose the idea make sense?
The more automatic stuff we do and we don't have to involve the user,
the better.
However, lemme look at Chao's current patchset first - we should not go
nuts by putting SRAT parsing everywhere :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists