[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c3dd9c2-4240-7bb5-c0ff-af6f2e479c31@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 13:34:03 +0100
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: respect virtual boundary mask in bvecs
On 05/11/2018 13:01, Ming Lei wrote:
> If you mean the real huge page, this patch shouldn't have made a difference
> because bio_vec->bv_offset is in [0, PAGE_SIZE), and iSer sets virt
> boundary as 4K - 1.
>
> However, things will change after multipage bvec is introduced.
Hi Ming,
I've received a blktrace from our customer showing the issue [1].
In this example trace they've submitted (contiguous) 64K I/Os and
without this patch, they're seeing a lot of splits as indicated by the
trace.
With the patch applied the I/O is directly issued to the LLDD without
the splits.
[1] http://beta.suse.com/private/jthumshirn/blktrace.txt
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs
jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists