[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181106151444.GA11221@avx2>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 18:14:44 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: willy@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + fls-change-parameter-to-unsigned-int.patch added to -mm tree
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 03:33:01PM -0800, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> -static inline int fls(int x)
> +static inline int fls(unsigned int x)
> {
> - return fls64((unsigned int) x);
> + return fls64(x);
> }
Should it return "unsigned"? Logically it should.
I remember doing this and there was some code size increase :-(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists