linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] Allwinner H6 DE3 and HDMI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4663462.5OBby1Icb2@jernej-laptop>
Date:   Tue, 06 Nov 2018 16:54:56 +0100
From:   Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     wens@...e.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, airlied@...ux.ie, architt@...eaurora.org,
        a.hajda@...sung.com, Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] Allwinner H6 DE3 and HDMI support

Dne ponedeljek, 05. november 2018 ob 10:43:41 CET je Maxime Ripard napisal(a):
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > This series adds support for Display Engine 3.0 and HDMI 2.0a, which
> > can be found on H6 SoC.
> > 
> > Display Engine 3.0 in comparison to 2.0 mostly adds features needed for
> > displaying and processing 10-bit and AFBC formats, which are not yet
> > supported by this series.
> > 
> > H6 is also the first SoC which supports IOMMU, but support for it is
> > not yet added.
> > 
> > This series is based on linux-next at next-20181102.
> > 
> > I suggest all patches go through allwinner tree, except DRM patches,
> > which should go through drm-misc tree.
> 
> Applied all patches up to the 26. The two last one however should not
> use the clk bindings define you added in the first clk patches, since
> clk and dt patches are going through different tree.

Thanks!

Should I send remaining 2 patches as v4 or can be send separately?

Best regards,
Jernej