lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:51:35 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        bp@...en8.de, namit@...are.com, joe@...ches.com,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        segher@...nel.crashing.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tree-wide: Remove __inline__ and __inline usage

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:42 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Do you want me to do that patch, or have you already just done it?

I'd rather see it go through something like -tip than doing it myself
directly, and get at least some of the automated testing before
unleashing it on an unsuspecting world.

I don't think it will affect much, but there *could* be situations
where there are some crusty __inline__ users that actually want
__always_inline behavior.

And we *may* actually have cases where we want the "let compiler make
a judgement call" behavior, so with this change people will have that
as an option. But yes, in the short term, it has the possibility of
regressions due to missed inlining.

                Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ