[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181107143744.2dd91690aad06ab1d678dfe8@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 14:37:44 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: chouryzhou (周威)
<chouryzhou@...cent.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"arve@...roid.com" <arve@...roid.com>,
"tkjos@...roid.com" <tkjos@...roid.com>,
"dave@...olabs.net" <dave@...olabs.net>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] binder: ipc namespace support for android binder
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:48:12 +0000 chouryzhou(周威) <chouryzhou@...cent.com> wrote:
> > > --- a/ipc/namespace.c
> > > +++ b/ipc/namespace.c
> > > @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ static struct ipc_namespace *create_ipc_ns(struct
> > user_namespace *user_ns,
> > > ns->ucounts = ucounts;
> > >
> > > err = mq_init_ns(ns);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + goto fail_put;
> > > + err = binder_init_ns(ns);
> > > if (err)
> > > goto fail_put;
> > >
> >
> > Don't we need an mq_put_mnt() if binder_init_ns() fails?
> >
> > free_ipc_ns() seems to have forgotten about that too. In which case it
> > must be madly leaking mounts so probably I'm wrong. Confused.
> >
>
> mq_init_ns will do clean job if it failed, and as do binder_init_ns.
My point is that if mq_init_ns() succeeds and binder_init_ns() fails,
we don't undo the effects of mq_init_ns()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists