[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181107150052.ed3d26414c3b2f74956a3d42@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:00:52 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleksiy.Avramchenko@...y.com, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] z3fold: encode object length in the handle
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:27:36 +0100 Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Den tors 25 okt. 2018 kl 21:42 skrev Andrew Morton <
> akpm@...ux-foundation.org>:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:28:21 +0200 Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Reclaim and free can race on an object (which is basically ok) but
> > > in order for reclaim to be able to map "freed" object we need to
> > > encode object length in the handle. handle_to_chunks() is thus
> > > introduced to extract object length from a handle and use it during
> > > mapping of the last object we couldn't correctly map before.
> >
> > What are the runtime effects of this change?
> >
>
> I haven't observed any adverse impact with this change used in zswap (and
> in fact, this is a bugfix for zswap operation). There is a slight under 1%
> impact when z3fold is used with ZRAM but since the support for ZRAM over
> zpool is still out of tree, I take it doesn't matter at this point, right?
>
I mean "runtime effects", not "run time effects" ;)
Apart from wishing to document this change fully, I'm trying to
understand which kernel version(s) need the fix. To understand that, I
need to know the effect upon end-user-visible behaviour. You say it
fixes a bug - please describe that bug: how it is triggered, what
effect is has, etc.
Also, any suggestions as to which kernel versions we should fix is
always welcome.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists