[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181107083928.vqgnpw3mmczjn4el@M43218.corp.atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:39:28 +0100
From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
To: Andrei Stefanescu - M50506 <Andrei.Stefanescu@...rochip.com>
CC: "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Nicolas Ferre - M43238 <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Cristian Birsan - M91496 <Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: at91: switched to resume/suspend callbacks.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:17:47PM +0200, Andrei Stefanescu - M50506 wrote:
> In the previous version of the driver resume/suspend_noirq callbacks
> were used. Because of this, when resuming from suspend-to-ram,
> an I2C (belonging to a FLEXCOM) would resume before FLEXCOM.
> The first read on the I2C bus would then result in a timeout.
>
> This patch switches to resume/suspend callbacks which are
> called after FLEXCOM resumes. FLEXCOM, SPI and USART drivers use
> resume/suspend callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@...rochip.com>
I can't figure out why we use the _noirq variant. When patches for PM
stuff were sent, suspend/resume callbacks were used but in the latest
version it moved to the _noirq variant without explanation.
Excepting if someone has an argument to keep the _noirq variant,
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Thanks
Regards
Ludovic
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> index bfd1fdf..81f7b94 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> @@ -1174,7 +1174,7 @@ static int at91_twi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> return clk_prepare_enable(twi_dev->clk);
> }
>
> -static int at91_twi_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +static int at91_twi_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
> at91_twi_runtime_suspend(dev);
> @@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ static int at91_twi_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int at91_twi_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +static int at91_twi_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct at91_twi_dev *twi_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
> @@ -1202,8 +1202,8 @@ static int at91_twi_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops at91_twi_pm = {
> - .suspend_noirq = at91_twi_suspend_noirq,
> - .resume_noirq = at91_twi_resume_noirq,
> + .suspend = at91_twi_suspend,
> + .resume = at91_twi_resume,
> .runtime_suspend = at91_twi_runtime_suspend,
> .runtime_resume = at91_twi_runtime_resume,
> };
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists