[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181107163841.GA18091@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:38:41 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it, bristot@...hat.com,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
longman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: make callback_lock raw
Hi,
On 07/11/18 07:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:34:16PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > It would be great if you could please have a look at the proposed change
> > below (and the rest of the set of course :-).
>
> Yeah, looks good to me. Please feel free to add
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks!
> > Another bit that I'd be more comfortable after hearing your word on it
> > is this one (discussed over 5/5):
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180925130750.GA25664@localhost.localdomain/
>
> Can you please loop Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> into discussion?
> He's working on cgroup2 cpuset support which might collide.
Sure, I've been originally working on this on top of his series, but
didn't try with latest version. Hopefully the two series don't generate
too much collisions. I'll try to find some time soon to check again.
In the meantime, Waiman Long, how do you feel about it? :-)
Thread starts at (you if missed it)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180903142801.20046-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com/
Best,
- Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists